Fed to the tune of $61 million a year, the Global Engagement Center was a failed attempt at narrative control
By Rachel Marsden, a columnist, political strategist, and host of independently produced talk-shows in French and English.
By Rachel Marsden, a columnist, political strategist, and host of independently produced talk-shows in French and English.
rachelmarsden.com
FILE PHOTO. © Celal Gunes / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images If the nosy grandma peering out the window were a government entity, it would be the Global Engagement Center. The priciest hall monitor in history has just been given a pink slip. The Global Engagement Center, created by then President Barack Obama’s executive order in 2016, was supposed to help fight terrorist messaging. But the neocon majority in Congress successfully pushed for it to become more involved in fighting “Russian election interference” – or, more like flooding voters’ brains with the idea of it. Its speech and narrative policing under the guise of combating fake news ultimately became so intolerable that its spending was just cut from the latest budget bill and its operations have now been shut down. The center’s demise also may or may not have had something to do with the fact that it was exceptionally lazy and stupid, even as far as government initiatives go. American taxpayers have been paying $61 million a year for this entity to crank out a grand total of about eight reports over as many years. Yep, that’s about $61 million per report, one of which was called “Gendered Disinformation.” Other activities include issuing press releases with titles like, “Faces of Kremlin Propaganda: Dmitri Peskov.” Oh wow, guys, you found one! And it’s none other than the public official whose actual job title is communications chief for the Kremlin. How many Americans would have otherwise been duped! Imagine Russians paying one of their government agencies tens of millions a year to “expose” the White House Press Secretary as speaking for Washington.
Read more The center also spent a lot of resources promoting Russian-linked media as Russian-linked. And also as totally badass. They wouldn’t shut up about it, effectively generating one giant free advertising campaign targeting citizens who might be curious about this thing that’s managed to get under Washington’s skin so badly. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, citing the work of the center, called for the entire world to unite against RT. “We know that RT possesses cyber capabilities and engaged in covert information influence operations and military procurement,” he said in September 2024. Guess he was referring to my bulk ordering of missiles on Amazon Prime. China was another obsession. “Every country should have the ability to tell its story to the world,” began a report from 2023 titled “How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment.” It then proceeded to tell China exactly how it shouldn’t be telling its story to the world. The Center accused China of “digital authoritarianism” and using “intimidation to silence dissent and encourage self-censorship.” Sounds like US academia. Or the Global Engagement Center. How about France’s arrest of Telegram founder Pavel Durov last summer, now charged with enabling crimes like pedocriminality, fraud, and drug trafficking just for having created the platform? President Emmanuel Macron wined and dined Durov personally from 2018 to 2021, even giving him fast track French citizenship, and is now behaving like a psycho ex who didn’t get what he wanted. Like maybe the encryption keys. No statement from the center on that one, huh? Or on the comments by Durov’s former PR guy suggesting that Macron is just acting as a wingman for Washington in all this. The center’s latest partner is Kiev, with which they set up the Ukraine Communications Group, along with Poland, to fight Russia informationally. If they have such a crack team, then why is it all over social media that the latest campaign out of Kiev, honoring Ukrainian fighters killed in Russia’s Kursk region at schools and social centers, shows supporters holding up “hero” headshots of porn stars Johnny Sins of “Brazzers” fame and Billy Harrington, instead? How about the whole Azov neo-Nazi rebranding initiative? There’s such a lack of clarity or historical truth on that issue from the center that the entire Canadian parliament was brainwashed into clapping for a bona fide World War II-era Ukrainian Nazi last year.
Read more What about the Ghost of Kiev and the heroes of Snake Island? Any interest in correcting those myths out of Kiev from the early days of the conflict? Or perhaps the center could have come to Kiev’s rescue when it was being blamed all over the Western press, from Germany to the US, for a covert operation to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline and taking out the Russian fuel for the EU’s economic engine along with it. Nothing but radio silence on that one. So is it true, then? Or is it just a much more convenient narrative to leave hanging out there in the public domain than the suggestion that Washington had anything to do with it? In June 2024, the Center made a deal for cooperation with Romania to counter foreign election manipulation. The presidential election there was just recently cancelled, in the wake of a populist with a PhD in agronomy winning the first round of voting. Hardly surprising amid a farmers’ uprising against the EU’s heavy-handed regulations and favoritism for Ukrainian imports. Russian election interference via a paid TikTok campaign was blamed, which the investigative outlet Snoop.ro now says was actually paid for by the party of the current president – the same one that complained about the results and demanded a do-over. Guess the center never considered that on the meddling front, the call would be coming from inside the house. Speaking of which, Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook and its parent company, Meta, admitted in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee in August that the Biden administration asked Facebook to censor Covid-19 content, including humor and satire, and that his teams complied. He also said that the FBI warned them about Russian disinformation on the Biden family’s dealings with Burisma (the Ukrainian energy company where Hunter Biden served on the board), which ultimately turned out not to be Russian fake news, even though Facebook had agreed to demote the story at the time. What’s that complaint about Chinese censorship again? People are increasingly fed up with these efforts by Washington to obsessively patrol narratives in order to enforce its “rules based order” that primarily just serves special interests. All you need to know about how annoyed Americans are is that they just voted for a first-class online troll as president, who has spent the last few days tweeting up a storm to everyone’s amusement, suggesting that the Panama Canal is American, Canada should be the 51st state, and Greenland should be owned by the US. The Global Engagement Center and its likeminded proponents have irritated everyone so much with their hounding attempts to impose their vision for the decor, that the bulldozer has now just straight-up ripped right through their own house. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
